Sunday, February 24, 2013

Best Dressed from the Oscars

I've stopped paying attention to the Oscars because, lately, the dresses have been less than thrilling.  It's always the same poufy ballgown, slinky red dress, or beaded/sequined frock.  Yawwwwn.

My fiancee texted me to remind me about tonight's Oscars on TV.  I opted to just do a quick search online.  Man, talk about underwhelming.  As nice as some of them are, they're just nice and nice doesn't cut it.  These celebrities have millions, billions, and gajillions of dollars and they can't buy some better dresses?  Or, maybe the designers aren't cuttin' it this year?  I'm surprised no one was wearing Vera Wang.  She was on fi-yah back in the 2000s.

After much deliberation, the only dress that I sorta kinda liked was Zoe Saldana's.  And even then, I'm not sure how I feel about the frilly floral things on the bust, and that belt!  That belt makes the dress seem less formal.  The only reason I picked this dress was because of the open front skirt.  I imagine it flows nicely with you while you're walking, kind of like a pretty mop as it glides across the floor.  Okay, that doesn't sound like an attractive description.  You know what I mean, like it sweeps the floor in an elegant, fluttering manner.

Sigh..Zoe looks so sad and to top it off, her make-up is lookin' booty.  The model looks better than her. =(



To cheer Zoe and myself up, I've compiled my list of the top 5 best dressed ladies of the past Oscars.

5.  Diane Kruger in Chanel, 2011

This is so chic, yet very classic. The tiers of flowers and pleating at the lower hem are gorgeous.  Who can resist Chanel?


4. Nicole Kidman in Chanel, 2002.
Dreamy and frothy.  It's simple, but so pretty and delicate.  Like I said, who doesn't love Chanel? 


3. Michelle Williams in Vera Wang, 2006
Love the color! Oh, and the ruffled bodice, low-neck line, pleating at the center of the skirt, and sheer overlay on the train. It's all in the details.


2.  Charlize Theron in Vera Wang, 2000
Charlize was sportin' that old Hollywood Glamour before everyone was doing it on the red carpet. She even has fingerwaves and that plunging back is so sexy! I loved her look so much; I had something very similar made for my senior prom.  Unfortunately, I couldn't find anything like those Fred Leighton clips and had to settle for big pearl beads from Michael's.  And, I couldn't find anyone that could do fingerwaves on Asian hair.  Needless to say, it was sort of a fail. 


1. Cate Blanchett in Givency Haute Couture, 2011
It's not sexy, slinky, or body-hugging, but it's so different from anything I've seen at any awards show thus far!  The silhouette of the shoulders is unique.  It juts straight out instead of forming a sleeve or conforming to the shoulder and arms.  It looks a little odd at first, but it works! The beaded detailing on the front is beautiful--subtle, but intriguing.  Then you have that little pop of yellow at the top of the shoulders that continue down the back.  I adore this dress!


Honorable Mention: Michelle Williams in Chanel, 2011 

It's not just the dress, but Michelle William's overall look.  I love its simplicity: pixie haircut, no jewelry (except those tiny earrings), and light pink lips.  The dress itself is also very simple: sheer, white beading, and column silhouette with cap sleeves.  The sheerness of the dress follows every curve of her body.  It's sexy, but not overtly so.  She looks so polished and elegant that I'm thinking of reorganizing this list.  

When it comes to formal wear, Vera Wang and Chanel are your best bets! Marchesa also has some good stuff too, but that's for another list and another time.


Forever Young

I found a video of Gwen Stefani before No Doubt made it big with their Tragic Kingdom album.  Even without the bleached hair and signature red lips, she was still as adorable then as she is now and that was twenty plus years ago!



It's crazy watching her music videos from the 90s because it looks like she has not aged at all.  And look at that tummy!

1995
2013



Prabal Gurung

I stopped by Target a few days ago for...I think, toothpaste? I can't even remember because I, instead, ended up meandering around the Prabal Gurung rack, which didn't have anything worth buying. I'm already sick of those tired prints, and I don't own any PG stuff.  And, how many collar shirts--buttoned up to the top-- do you really need? 



It's only natural. Clothes always lead to shoes.  I wasn't impressed. The two most decent ones out of his whole collection are the lace-up pumps and flat sandals, but I'm thinking of returning them. 



The lace-up pumps are fun, stylish, and relatively inexpensive--although, I think $40 is pushing it.

I have a few flat, gladiator-type sandals, but these get brownie points for the reflective metal detailing.  They're also useful because they look great with wide or flare-y pants. 

Anyway, I wasn't too impressed with PG, but I've completely changed my mind after seeing his 2013 Resort Collection.

  Been seeing peplum everywhere, and on everything. I'm almost tired of that shit. Almost.


Work that "marijuana" print! Then puff...puff...pass. I just don't like that hideous black blouse (bottom middle). How is that attractive on anyone?


The same black blouse, but in red you might be able to pull off.  My fave is the shiny blue pant ensemble (top right).  I'm questioning that cape-like tunic thing (bottom middle).  It miiiiiight work.  

 Sigh...




These are the ones.  The geo prints or colorblocking mixed with the delicate floral background is fab. 


 These, too, are my absolute faves.   The knee length jacket outfit (bottom left) is MINE.  I will find a way to make it mine!




I'm in love....  The prints, silhouettes, and styles are so new and fresh! Some more than others, but overall...LOVE.  I would buy everything--going to start saving that allowance--and wear everything.  It's so different from his Target collection.  My only criticism is the tacky, uninspiring evening wear (last picture).  The red and white flowy numbers are okay, but the rest are monstrous.  Maybe because that red, short satin thing (top middle) distracts you, and its tackiness just leaches on to the rest of the garments.  Barf. 

Sunday, February 17, 2013

Fitted #5

Just got back from a dinner party.  Delicious home-cooked Thai food, a rousing five minutes of Taboo, and some unexpected relationship drama. Funz.

Yes, more leggings.  I worked out today so I'm one day closer to wearing jeans again, but you'll be seeing these bad boys for awhile.


Jacket: Luella for Target, top: H&M, leggings: Shosho, shoes: L.A.M.B., bracelets: F21, ring: House of Harlow. 

Friday, February 15, 2013

Fitted #4

What to wear when you can't fit into any of your jeans? Leggings!  They will be my wardrobe staple until I begin my P90X and Insanity regimen, whenever that will be. Yes, that's House on TV and please ignore all the junk on the floor.  The socks are clean, by the way.




Cardigan: Susina (Wasteland, San Francisco); top: Charlotte Russe; leggings: MNN; necklace: H&M; Ring: Betsey Johnson; Shoes: L.A.M.B.

Thursday, February 14, 2013

I luv Valentimes' day


I always wondered what was correct: Valentines, Valentine’s, or Valentines’?  Well, it’s none of them!  This is crucial to know.  Not just because it’s Valentine’s Day, but also, nothing is more embarrassing than giving that hottie a card signed, “happy Valentines day.”  You’re not in high school anymore when wRiTinG n sPeLLinG lyKe diS wUz cOO. 

Instead of that sexy post-date “dessert," you’ll probably end up joining your mom in front of the TV with a pint of mint chocolate chip (according to the Washington Post).  I really didn’t want to spend another Valentimes Valentines Valentine’s Valentine’s Day with my mom and Paris by Night.  Plus, no one likes to see bad grammar.  Well, people that know better.  As a result, I had to do my research. I want to be, or at least try to be, those people that know better!  That being said, you're very welcome to go back to all my previous posts and point out all my misspellings, incorrect grammar, punctuation errors, run-on sentences, fragments, improper word usage, etc.  

First, Valentine’s Day is capitalized.  It’s a holiday.  All holidays (the specific names of the holidays, not the actual word—unless it’s “Happy Holidays” used as a heading on a greeting card) are capitalized.  So, like "Happy Holidays," the entire phrase, "Happy Valentine's Day", needs to be capitalized unless you're using it in a sentence to describe the holiday ("Today will be a happy Valentine's Day.") and not as a greeting or heading. 

Second, Valentine’s Day is from the Catholic saint Valentine.  If you've heard “Valentime” or “Valentimes”, they are wrong! So wrong!  Where did the “m” sound come from?  I guess “m” and “n” sound the same…to idiots!  

Third, when referencing this holiday, it has to be “Valentine’s Day.”  The word “day” has to be included, or it won’t fly.  This day is dedicated to him, which means it BELONGS to him.  Therefore, an apostrophe is a must! 

I'll end this with some pretty lingerie that you will now get to see/receive tonightbecause of your grammar prowess!

Agent Provocateur "Angeliqua"



Agent Provocateur, "Caitlin"

Agent Provocateur, "Gene"

HAPPY VALENTINE'S DAY!

School Notes (clarification)

From Monday's notes, I was talking about the process designers use to evaluate fabrics when buying or determining which would be best for a specific garment.  Just to recap, they examine eight categories:

1. Flexibility
2. Compressibility
3. Extensibility
4. Resilience
5. Density
6. Surface Friction: slippery to harsh
7. Surface Contour: smooth to rough
8. Thermal Character

Surface friction and surface contour were confusing because they seemed like similar terms ("friction" and "contour" are both tactile) and used synonyms to describe each other ("slippery" and "smooth", "harsh" and "rough").

Clarification: 

Surface friction
  • tactile (how the fabric feels when you rub your fingers across it) 
  •  wool 
    • The texture is not obvious, but when you touch it it's harsh (scratchy against skin) 

Surface contour
  • visual (what you see) 
  • if there's bumpiness or some other texture 
  • corduroy 
    • ridges are visible
The two categories are related, but they both discuss different aspects of a fabric.

Hope that clears it up!